In short
For many people, yes. One in ten partnered US adults met their partner on a dating site or app, and online became the most common way US heterosexual couples met. It is also slower and more tiring than the adverts suggest. DatingAgency.com's view: it is worth it if you know what you want and give it steady, limited time.
| UK adults who visited a dating service, May 2024 | One in ten (Ofcom, Online Nation 2024) |
|---|---|
| US adults who have ever used a dating site or app | 30% (Pew Research Center, surveyed July 2022) |
| Partnered US adults who met their partner online | 10% overall; 20% of those under 30 (Pew) |
| US heterosexual couples who met online, 2017 | 39%, up from 2% in 1995 (Rosenfeld and others, PNAS 2019) |
| Users who rate their experience positively | 53% positive, 46% negative (Pew) |
"Is it worth it?" usually means two questions. Does it actually work, in the sense that people meet partners this way? And will it work for me, given my time, my patience and what I can afford? The research answers the first fairly clearly. The second depends on how you use it.
How many people meet partners online
The best evidence on how couples meet comes from the United States, so most figures here are American. We have not found UK data of the same quality on how couples met; Ofcom measures how many people use dating services, not what happens next.
- Use is common but not universal. Ofcom found that one in ten UK online adults visited a dating service in May 2024, much the same as the 11% a year earlier. Reach was highest among 18 to 24 year olds (18%) and 25 to 34 year olds (17%).
- About three in ten US adults have tried it. Pew Research Center's survey of 6,034 adults in July 2022 found 30% had ever used a dating site or app, the same share as in 2019, and 9% had done so in the past year.
- One in ten partnered adults met online. Among US adults who were married, living with a partner or in a committed relationship, 10% met their partner on a dating site or app. For partnered adults under 30 it was one in five, and for lesbian, gay and bisexual adults about a quarter (24%).
- Online is now the most common way couples meet. A 2019 study by sociologists at Stanford and the University of New Mexico, published in PNAS, found that 39% of US heterosexual couples who met in 2017 met online, up from 2% in 1995, while meeting through friends fell from 33% to 20%. Online overtook friends around 2013.
Two things are worth knowing about that last figure. It counts couples, not users, so it says nothing about how long each person spent searching. And the authors note that once couples are together, how they met does not determine the quality or length of the relationship; couples who met online did move to marriage faster.
So the honest answer to "does it work" is yes, for a large number of people. It is not a fringe or last-resort route.
What people find hard about it
The same Pew survey is just as clear about the downsides.
- Mixed experiences. 53% of users described their experience as positive and 46% as negative. Men were more positive (57%) than women, who were split almost evenly (48% positive, 51% negative).
- Too many messages, or too few. Among recent users, 54% of women said they had felt overwhelmed by the number of messages they received, while 64% of men said they had felt insecure about the lack of messages.
- Unwanted behaviour. 56% of women under 50 who had used dating sites or apps had been sent a sexually explicit message or image they didn't ask for, and 43% had been contacted again after saying they weren't interested. These experiences were less common among women 50 and over and among men.
- Scams. 52% of users said they had come across someone they thought was trying to scam them. Our romance scams guide explains the pattern.
- Safety doubts. 48% of US adults said online dating was a very or somewhat safe way to meet people, down from 53% in 2019.
None of that means it isn't worth doing. It does mean the experience is uneven, and that the way you use a site has a big effect on how it feels.
Who tends to do well
There is no study that sorts users into "successful" and "unsuccessful" types, so treat this as a mix of evidence and experience.
People who know what they want. In Pew's survey, 44% of recent users said meeting a long-term partner was a major reason for using a site, and 40% said casual dating. When you are in the first group, say so plainly on your profile; it saves you weeks with people in the second. Our guide to writing a dating profile shows how.
People who commit for a defined period. Pew found 58% of people who had paid for a site described their experience as positive, compared with half of those who had never paid. That is a correlation, not proof that paying works, but it fits what most people find: dipping in occasionally rarely leads anywhere, while a few focused months often does.
People who move to meeting. Long message threads feel like progress and often aren't. People who suggest a short call, then a coffee, within a couple of weeks learn faster who is worth their time. See from messages to a first date.
People who treat it as one route among several. Online dating works alongside friends, clubs and work, not instead of them.
How it compares with an agency or matchmaker
| Item | Online dating | Dating agency | Personal matchmaker |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who searches | You | The agency, from its own members | The matchmaker, sometimes beyond their own list |
| Typical cost | A subscription, often monthly | An upfront fee; published UK fees we checked started at £499 | Often several thousand pounds |
| What is checked | Varies by site; ask exactly what | Often an interview and ID; not honesty | Usually an interview; ask what else |
| How many people you see | As many as you choose | A set number of introductions | Fewer, more selected |
| Control | Full | Shared | Mostly theirs |
An agency is worth considering if your time is scarcer than your money and you want someone else to do the first round of filtering. Read agency, matchmaker or dating site for the full comparison, what dating agencies cost for published fees, and is a matchmaker worth it for working out the cost per introduction. Many people try a dating site first because the cost of finding out is low.
How to make it worth the money
- Browse before you pay. On most sites, including ours, joining and browsing are free. Search your age range and area first and count how many people you would genuinely want to write to. If it's a handful, widen your distance or try another site before you subscribe.
- Pay for a period you will actually use. A short membership in a month when you have time to reply beats a long one you forget about. Our guide to online dating costs explains trials and auto-renewal.
- Set a renewal reminder. Most memberships renew automatically. Put the date in your calendar the day you pay.
- Give it a time budget, not a mood. Twenty minutes a few times a week is more effective than an evening's binge followed by a fortnight of silence. Our guide to dating when you're busy suggests a routine.
- Judge it by conversations and dates, not matches. After a month, ask: how many real conversations have I had, and how many led to a call or a meeting? If the answer is none, change the profile, the photos or the site before you blame online dating.
- Protect yourself while you do it. Never send money to someone you haven't met. Our safety guide covers the rest.
When it probably isn't worth it for you
If every session leaves you feeling worse, take a break; nothing is lost by stepping away for a month. If you have tried properly for several months, with a profile a friend has read and photos taken in the last year, and nothing has come of it, an agency, a matchmaker or meeting people through activities may suit you better. And if you are not sure you want a relationship right now, wait until you do. People can tell.
About our own service
DatingAgency.com runs its own online dating service. Joining, making a profile and browsing are free; reading and replying to messages needs a paid membership, which renews automatically until you cancel in Settings > Billing. Photos are reviewed before they appear, but what members write about themselves is not checked. Profiles are shared with partner sites in the same network, so members of other sites can see and message you.
Join Dating Agency free
Free to join and browse. Reading and replying to messages is paid.
Questions people ask
Do people really find long-term partners online?
Yes. In Pew Research Center's 2022 survey, one in ten partnered US adults had met their partner on a dating site or app, rising to one in five of those under 30. A Stanford-led study found meeting online had become the most common way US heterosexual couples met, at 39% of couples who met in 2017.
Are relationships that start online less likely to last?
The 2019 PNAS study by Rosenfeld, Thomas and Hausen states that once couples are in a relationship, how they met does not determine relationship quality or longevity. It did find heterosexual couples who met online moved to marriage faster.
Is paying for online dating worth it?
Pew found that 58% of people who had paid for a dating site or app described their experience as positive, against half of those who had never paid. That doesn't prove paying causes success, but it suggests people who commit tend to get more from it. Browse free first so you know who is near you before paying.
Is online dating worse for women?
Experiences differ. Pew found women users were split almost evenly between positive and negative experiences, while 57% of men were positive. A majority of women under 50 who had used dating sites or apps had received sexually explicit messages or images they didn't ask for.
Is a dating agency better than online dating?
It depends on whether you are shorter of time or money. An agency or matchmaker does the searching for an upfront fee (the published UK fees we checked in October 2026 started at £499); online dating costs far less, but you do the work yourself. Our guide to agencies, matchmakers and dating sites compares the three.
Keep reading
- What online dating costs, and how subscriptions workFree, freemium and paid dating sites, trials that roll over, auto-renewal, cancelling, refunds and UK consumer rights.
- Online dating over 40 and into your 50sOnline dating in your 40s and 50s: what you want, children and exes, profiles and photos, pace, scams and confidence.
- Online dating terms, explained in plain EnglishA plain-English A to Z of online dating terms, from benching and breadcrumbing to sextortion, situationships and zombieing.
- Romance scams: how they work and how to stop oneHow romance scams unfold, the stories scammers use, how to check someone, and what to do and where to report if you've paid.
Sources
- Key findings about online dating in the U.S., Pew Research Center (2 February 2023)
- Disintermediating your friends: How online dating in the United States displaces other ways of meeting, Rosenfeld, Thomas and Hausen, PNAS 116(36), 2019
- Full text of the PNAS paper, PubMed Central
- Online Nation 2024 report, Ofcom
- Appy Valentine's Day: top online dating trends revealed, Ofcom (14 February 2025)
Checked 20 October 2026. Spotted something out of date? Tell us.

